- #Camaro white book download update
- #Camaro white book download driver
- #Camaro white book download manual
The Mustang driver doesn’t feel like he or she sacrificed too much in opting for the powerful EcoBoost turbo four, while the turbo Camaro driver questions whether maybe the raucous V-6 would have been a better idea. It’s still quick, easily a rival for the rear-wheel-drive Hyundai Genesis Coupe and much quicker than the Subaru BRZ, but the Mustang is more satisfying to drive. The Mustang EcoBoost has received some flak for actually piping a soundtrack through the car’s stereo as the engine revs build, and now we see what happens when this feature isn’t included – it’s too quiet, and the idea that you’re driving a racy sports car isn’t communicated well to the driver. There’s no aural punch to the exhaust soundtrack, no visceral grunt to match the car’s appearance – close your eyes (as a passenger) and you may as well be riding in a Chevy Cruze. Aside from the car’s looks, the powertrain provides no thrills. It’s great around town, and given the lightness of the Camaro platform and its excellent handling characteristics (two descriptors it still amazes me to write), it makes for an entertaining sports car.īut it comes with no drama, meaning the good kind.
#Camaro white book download manual
Plant your foot and row through the surprisingly clunky six-speed manual gearbox, and you’ll notice the greatest acceleration happens as the needle climbs above 3,000 rpm, but the small four-cylinder then runs out of steam at higher revs. The engine feels similar to the Ford Mustang’s EcoBoost 2.3-liter turbo four, in that most of that torque comes on in the midrange. It produces 295 pounds-feet of torque - more than many V-8 engines made not even a decade ago - and is good enough to scoot the Camaro from zero-to-60 mph in just 5.4 seconds with the optional eight-speed automatic transmission, according to Chevrolet. This version of the Camaro is powered by a 275-hp, turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder engine. Unfortunately, one press of the starter button reveals that it’s not ready to do any such thing. It looks like a proper muscle car, able to take on the toughest, fastest, meanest Detroit offerings. Paint it all in one of the most vivid reds I’ve ever seen, and it becomes a bit of modern sculpture – sleek, low, wide, with some beautiful hood and fender lines blending into its muscular haunches. Start with the plain-Jane 1LT model, which has no fake hood scoops or other baubles, and add the RS Package with blacked-out 20-inch wheels, LED taillights, bi-xenon headlights, unique grille and subtle rear spoiler. This actually may be the best-looking version in the Camaro lineup. But with 275 horsepower on tap, is it still accurate to call the turbo Camaro a muscle car? Exterior & Styling
Now a third powertrain has joined the lineup at the entry level – a turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder, seen in other GM products such as the Cadillac ATS and CTS. Both of those models are outstanding performance cars the SS even won our 2016 V-8 Muscle Car Challenge.
#Camaro white book download update
The Chevrolet Camaro received its first major update in years for 2016, and we have thoroughly enjoyed it in both SS V-8 ( see the review) and RS V-6 forms. To see what’s new for 2017, click here, or to see a side-by-side comparison of the two model years, click here. For 2017, Chevrolet has added a new 50th Anniversary Edition and will be introducing the new ZL1 high-performance version, but this model is unchanged. The Dodge Challenger is much larger than the Chevy, and while it’s more comfortable and useful, it’s not nearly as athletic as the Camaro.Įditor’s note: This review was written in May 2016 for the 2016 Camaro Turbo. The four-cylinder Ford Mustang EcoBoost is more comfortable, upscale and entertaining to drive than the four-cylinder Camaro, but the Chevy beats the aging Hyundai Genesis Coupe in the value department. Featuring all the drawbacks and none of the visceral pleasures of more powerful Camaros, the turbocharged four-cylinder RS model is not our preferred version.